Last updated:
Author
Jimmy Aki
Author
Jimmy Aki
Share
Why Trust Cryptonews
Key Takeaways:
- Trading venues are reconfiguring their offerings to favor assets with strong reserve backing and enhanced disclosure standards.
- Market participants are urged to transition from risk-prone tokens to those meeting rigorous liquidity and transparency criteria.
- Stricter rules are catalyzing an industry-wide shift toward greater stability and improved consumer safeguards.
- Enhanced regulatory compliance is expected to build trust and foster a more resilient digital asset ecosystem.
Binance will delist nine stablecoins, including USDT and DAI, for European users by March 31, 2025, to comply with the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations, which impose stricter reserve requirements on stablecoin issuers.
As a result, affected stablecoin trading pairs will no longer be available in the European Economic Area (EEA), requiring users to adjust their holdings and trading strategies.
Binance has stated that users can convert affected stablecoins through Binance Convert to comply with the new regulations.
Binance’s Stablecoin Delistings: Which Assets Are Affected?
In a March 3 press release, the exchange revealed the full list of delisted stablecoins: Tether (USDT), Dai (DAI), First Digital USD (FDUSD), TrueUSD (TUSD), Pax Dollar (USDP), Anchored Euro (AEUR), TerraUSD (UST), TerraClassicUSD (USTC), and PAX Gold (PAXG).
The move aligns with MiCA’s tightening rules around stablecoin trading. Non-compliant stablecoins must be delisted by the end of Q1 2025.
Despite this widespread delisting, Binance assured that USDC, Eurite (EURI), and fiat pairs (EUR) would remain available to EEA users.
The exchange emphasized that these stablecoins fully comply with MiCA regulations and will continue to be supported for trading, deposits, and withdrawals.
MiCA’s Reserve Rules and the Stablecoin Divide
The MiCA regulatory framework came into effect on June 30, 2024. The policy mandates that stablecoins maintain a 1:1 reserve in liquid assets.
This requires every issued token to be backed by an equivalent value in reserves.
The regulation seeks to improve stability and reduce the risk of depegging by ensuring that stablecoins remain redeemable at face value.
However, not all stablecoins meet these strict guidelines. While USDT and DAI issuers claim they are fully backed, their compliance with MiCA’s reserve composition rules remains in question.
The regulation specifies that at least 30% of reserves must be held in deposits with credit institutions, increasing to 60% for major issuers.
Tether’s CEO, Paolo Ardoino, has criticized the 60% banking reserve requirement, arguing that it could expose stablecoin issuers to increased financial risks.
He points out that deposits exceeding €100,000 are not insured, meaning that large stablecoin issuers could face exposure if a bank encounters financial trouble.
Most banks operate on a fractional reserve system, meaning they lend out a high portion of customer deposits rather than keeping them in vaults.
If large stablecoin issuers are forced to keep 60% of their reserves in banks, those funds could become part of this lending cycle, raising questions about liquidity and accessibility during financial crises.
This perspective has fueled debates on whether MiCA’s regulations improve stability or introduce new vulnerabilities.
Algorithmic Stablecoins Face Permanent Exclusion
While fiat-backed stablecoins struggle to meet MiCA’s reserve requirements, algorithmic stablecoins like DAI and UST face an even harsher reality: they are simply not supported under MiCA regulations.
These stablecoins rely on smart contracts and algorithmic mechanisms rather than fiat reserves, making them inherently riskier.
The collapse of TerraUSD (UST) in 2022 highlighted the dangers of this model. Its algorithmic structure failed to maintain its peg, leading to massive losses.
Due to these risks, MiCA regulations prohibit algorithmic stablecoins, prompting Binance and other exchanges to delist them. The growing divide between compliant and non-compliant stablecoins illustrates the increasing influence of regulation in shaping the crypto sector.
Given such risks, MiCA regulations do not support algorithmic stablecoins, reinforcing why Binance and other platforms have chosen to remove them from stablecoin trading pairs.
The growing divide between compliant and non-compliant stablecoins illustrates the increasing influence of regulation in shaping the crypto sector.
For Binance, aligning with MiCA regulations is not just about compliance but also securing long-term viability in the European financial ecosystem.
As MiCA rules take full effect, exchanges, issuers, and users must carefully understand these changes and adapt to a market where only regulated stablecoins can thrive.
How Major Exchanges Are Responding
In addition to Binance’s delisting, Coinbase has removed non-compliant stablecoins in the EEA ahead of MiCA enforcement, set for the end of 2024.
To ensure a smooth transition, it has urged users to switch to compliant alternatives like Circle’s USDC and EURC, which meet MiCA’s regulatory standards.
Kraken has also announced plans to delist USDT and other non-compliant stablecoins for EEA users.
The process began in February 2025, with spot trading set to end on March 24, 2025, and any remaining holdings automatically converted by March 31, 2025.
Similarly, Crypto.com has followed suit, announcing the delisting of USDT and nine other tokens for European users.
Deposits were halted on January 31, 2025, with full delisting and withdrawal cutoffs scheduled for March 31, 2025.
The Road Ahead for Stablecoin Markets
Stablecoin markets are entering a new chapter marked by stricter oversight and defined risk profiles.
Regulatory measures require market players to review asset choices and adjust their trading practices.
This shift challenges traders to reconsider the balance between potential gains and unforeseen risks.
Market participants are invited to assess their strategies with renewed attention to detail.
Embracing these changes may set the stage for a more disciplined and reliable trading environment.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
MiCA requires stablecoin issuers to comply with strict licensing and reserve requirements. While USDT and USDC are widely used, their issuers must obtain approval to continue offering these assets in the EU. Failure to comply may result in delisting from European exchanges.
MiCA primarily regulates centralized stablecoin issuers, but DeFi platforms operating in the EU may face restrictions on using unauthorized stablecoins. Platforms might need to adjust their liquidity pools and switch to regulated alternatives to maintain compliance.
Stablecoin issuers that fail to comply with MiCA’s rules could face hefty fines, trading bans, or even restrictions on offering their services within the EU. Regulators will also have the authority to freeze non-compliant assets to protect consumers.
MiCA applies to stablecoins offered within the EU, but users may still access non-compliant stablecoins through offshore exchanges. However, European-based businesses and payment providers will be restricted from processing transactions involving unauthorized stablecoins. This could lead to reduced liquidity and fewer trading options for EEA users.
